Bonversations | Ep #39 | Nathan Oakley (14-Feb-2024)

What could possess somebody to partake in over 2,000 debates about Flat Earth?

Are the Flat Earth and pro-Science channels on youtube in a ‘symbiotic relationship’?

The big names of the FE scene circa 2016: where are they now (and where did the others go)?


Bonversations

Episode #39 – Nathan Oakley

Recorded and published: 14-Feb-2024

Part 1


Part 2

Members can find all Part  2 / aftershow / second hours HERE.

The second part of this call includes discussion about some of the big names in Flat Earth, past and present.

What was going on behind the scenes back in 2016 / 2017? What happened to some of these people?

If you have any interest in online ‘truth- related subcultures in general, and FE in particular, I think you’ll enjoy it.

Get instant access to Part 2 of this call (and dozens of other Bonversations) by joining now.

Treat yourself to the best interview-based content available in this corner of the internet 👍


Nathan Oakley

Check out his youtube channel here.


Links / shownotes

Clip featuring Eddie Bravo – here.

SciManDan / JLB videos – here and here.

JLB research concerning ‘ultrasound’ – here.

Interview clip from Part 2 – here.

Music from Part 2 – here.

Outro from Part 2 – here.


Production notes. Bonversations Ep #39. Recorded and published 14-Feb-2024.

2 thoughts on “Bonversations | Ep #39 | Nathan Oakley (14-Feb-2024)

  • February 15, 2024 at 8:15 am
    Permalink

    I enjoyed the conversation, you guys had a good dynamic. Nothing particularly thought provoking for me but comfortable & friendly to have on in the background while I worked. Nathan sounded like a very based guy.

    Reply
  • February 15, 2024 at 1:47 pm
    Permalink

    i just spent the last 6 weeks sans a proper laptop, and have had a few of these episodes in the past for myriad reasons. so i know all too well how difficult it is to function – and my work isn’t as ‘public’ as content creators with regular broadcasts, so i can imagine the stress levels. the difference it makes is substantial. i can even thrive with sub-optimal quarters and cash flow, but without a mac (for me) i’m miserable. cool that you have a support network to solve the essentials.

    would love to hear another non debate style chat with the two of you re: FE model problems, thought bubbles on what this game board is, et al…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *